|
بِسمِ
اللهِ
الرَّحْمَنِ
الرَّحِيمِ Allah,
in the name of, the Most Affectionate, the Eternally Merciful |
||
|
Your
Questions & Comments Don't suppress questions!
Questions are good for your intellectual health!!! |
آپ کے
سوالات و
تاثرات سوالات
کو دبائیے نہیں!
سوالات
ذہنی صحت کی
ضمانت ہیں!!! |
|
اردو
اور عربی
تحریروں کو بہتر
دیکھنے کے
لئے نسخ اور
نستعلیق
فانٹ یہاں سے
ڈاؤن لوڈ
کیجیے
|
||
|
Huroof Muqata'at,
Letters at the beginning of Quranic Surahs Don't hesitate to
share your questions and comments. They will be highly appreciated. I'll
reply ASAP if I know the answer. Send at mubashirnazir100@gmail.com . |
||
|
Asalam O Alykum, I was in touch with you over gmail
quite a time before while in Oman. I need your help in following: There is a bureaucrat who believes that "Nobody
can make perfect communication even prophets and God" then he quote
example of "Alif Laam
Meem" from Quran that God decend
something that we humans can't interpret. I have an opportunity to write 1 page assignment for
subject "How different people interpret same thing differently" and
I want to use this opportunity to discuss and clear his doubt about this issue.
Can you guide me on the ayats/ tafseer
points clarifying that "God did communicated perfectly" and why (if
he is wrong) he is wrong with his argument. I have only 1 page for this. Regards, Zeeshan October 2010 |
||
|
Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah It is a pleasure
to receive your mail after long time. In my opinion,
it is not correct to draw this conclusion from Huroof
Muqatta'aat. Definitely, if Allah wants to send
some message to His slaves, He will definitely make it clear according to
their level so that they can understand it. Everyone is Mr. Different and it
is quite natural to perceive and interpret things differently. It depends on
the background, education and experience of a person. Communication of Allah
is always perfect to His slaves according to their level. Same is the case
with prophets. Regarding Huroof Muqat'aat, scholars have different opinions. Many ancient
scholars considered them a communication of Allah that was specific to His
Prophet صلى
الله عليه
وسلم. Some have declared them Mutashabahat. A more detailed theory is presented by Hamiduddin Farahi and his
disciples that these are the names of Surahs. It was an ancient practice to
denote real objects with a single letter e.g. ن means a fish because it looks
like a fish-head and ط means a snake because it a sitting cobra resembles
it. The reason is that alphabet forms are derived from the pictorial script
that was common in the ancient world. You can find pictorial writing on
Egyptian inscriptions. The current scripts of different languages evolved
from the pictorial script. Since these letters are pictures, so it became
common to name objects by alphabets. wassalaam Mubashir |
||
|
مصنف
کی دیگر تحریریں Quranic
Arabic Program
/ Quranic Studies
Program / علوم
القرآن
پروگرام / قرآنی
عربی
پروگرام / سفرنامہ
ترکی
/ مسلم
دنیا اور
ذہنی، فکری
اور نفسیاتی غلامی / اسلام
میں جسمانی و
ذہنی غلامی
کے انسداد کی
تاریخ / تعمیر
شخصیت
پروگرام /
قرآن اور
بائبل
کے دیس میں / علوم
الحدیث: ایک
تعارف / کتاب
الرسالہ:
امام شافعی
کی اصول فقہ
پر پہلی کتاب
کا اردو
ترجمہ و
تلخیص
/ اسلام
اور دور حاضر
کی تبدیلیاں / ایڈورٹائزنگ
کا اخلاقی
پہلو سے
جائزہ / الحاد
جدید کے
مغربی اور
مسلم
معاشروں پر
اثرات / اسلام
اور نسلی و
قومی امتیاز / اپنی
شخصیت اور
کردار کی
تعمیر کیسے
کی جائے؟ / مایوسی
کا علاج کیوں
کر ممکن ہے؟ / دور
جدید میں
دعوت دین کا
طریق کار / اسلام
کا خطرہ: محض
ایک وہم یا
حقیقت / Quranic
Concept of Human Life Cycle
/ Empirical Evidence of God’s Accountability
|
||