|
بِسمِ
اللهِ
الرَّحْمَنِ
الرَّحِيمِ Allah, in the name of, the Most
Affectionate, the Eternally Merciful |
||
|
Your
Questions & Comments Don't suppress questions!
Questions are good for your intellectual health!!! |
آپ کے
سوالات و
تاثرات سوالات
کو دبائیے نہیں!
سوالات
ذہنی صحت کی
ضمانت ہیں!!! |
|
اردو
اور عربی تحریروں کو بہتر
دیکھنے کے
لئے نسخ اور
نستعلیق
فانٹ یہاں سے
ڈاؤن لوڈ کیجیے
|
||
|
Work of Nasir ud
Din Albani Don't hesitate to
share your questions and comments. They will be highly appreciated. I'll
reply ASAP if I know the answer. Send at mubashirnazir100@gmail.com . |
||
|
Question: Dear Brother Assalam o alaikum Have you heard about Sadeq Gumareh (late), or Ahmed Darwish.
They are sufi scholars. I also had talk with Ahmed Darwish via email. He also
told me to take 10 major books of Ahadith in which I will find about above 90
% hadith. They are very much against Nasir Uddeen Albany. He told me that we
are in disagreement with Nasir Uddeen Albany in about 4000 Hadith. Kazi |
||
|
Dear
Brother Wa
alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah I'm not
much aware about the Sufi Scholars you've mentioned. Mr. Ahmed Darwesh has
correctly mentioned to you that 90% of Ahadith are available in 10-12 books (i.e
Sihah Sitta + Musnad Ahmed + Tabrani + Musannaf Ibn Ibe Regarding
his disagreement with Albani, it is the right of everyone to agree or
disagree based on arguments. Albani has done a marvelous job in identifying
the real vs. fake Ahadith. But definitely he was not a prophet. We should not
be his blind followers. We should evaluate the work of Albani as well as that
of his critics in an unbiased manner. Albani
has based his work on sound arguments. If Darwesh disagrees with him on any
particular Hadith, he should bring forth his arguments. It will be a hard job.
For example, if Albani rejects a Hadith based on the argument that a narrator
X in the sanad (chain of narrators) of that Hadith is found unreliable. He
presents evidence about unreliability of Mr. X from ancient experts of Jirh
wa Ta'adeel (the process of evaluation of reliability of Hadith narrators) like
Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, Hatim, Yahya Ibn Mu'een etc. Now if a
person disagrees with Albani, he has to provide evidence from the same level
of experts of Jirh wa Ta''deel that Mr. X was a reliable person. If such
evidence is available, we should compare that with the evidence provided by
Albani in order to reach at a conclusion. But if such evidence is not
available, then that disagreement is nothing except an unproved claim which
has no place in the world of academics. I hope
this detail will help you. Since you have a strong interest in religious
studies, so why not to develop your own skills in all these religious
disciplines in order to evaluate the information yourself. I have
made it the objective of my life to make such disciplines available to
everyone and now working on it day and night. Just see the following link
which provides an outline of this project: http://www.mubashirnazir.org/Courses/IS001-00-Studiesurdu.htm
If you
are interested in this project, I'll cordially invite you to join me in that.
Please feel free to ask any question or to share your views about it. Remember
in your prayers during Ramadan wassalaam Mubashir Sep 2009 |
||
|
Assalam U
Alaekum Ahmed
Darwish is the owner of sites Allah.com and Muhammad.com. I asked a scholar
about the disagreement of about 4000 Ahadith, he said that is too much. He
said Imam Albani has made mistakes, but he says that this number is quite too
much, it cannot be true. I saw your course, I will
study it when I get time. I will ask you about certain questions once I get
to read my interested subjects in your course. Have you
seen Imam Albani's article on wikipedia.org. I am astonished to see how much
people hate him. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral but I my self cannot
comment on that article with its heavy criticism of Imam Albani. Wassalam |
||
|
Wa
alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah About
Albani, yes 4000 Ahadith is an exaggeration. Anyway, we should compare both
views based on their arguments in an unbiased manner in order to reach at a
conclusion. The
criticism on Albani is mainly from Sufis because the entire building of
Sufism is constructed on Fake Ahadith. Unfortunately, it has become a common
attitude in Muslims. When they agree with a person, they love him. They are
not satisfied unless they raise him to the position of a prophet. Considering
a person the criteria for the right and the wrong is considering him
equivalent to a prophet. On the
contrary, if they disagree with a person, the convert their disagreement into
hatred. Then they try to degrade that person by all means. We should
seek refuge of Allah from such attitude. We should try to be unbiased because
it is the requirement of the Holy Quran to be just. Please
feel free to ask the questions after reading that material. wassalaam Mubashir Sep 2009 |
||
|
مصنف
کی دیگر تحریریں قرآنی
عربی
پروگرام / سفرنامہ
ترکی
/ مسلم
دنیا اور ذہنی،
فکری اور نفسیاتی
غلامی
/ اسلام
میں جسمانی و
ذہنی غلامی
کے انسداد کی
تاریخ / تعمیر
شخصیت
پروگرام /
قرآن اور
بائبل
کے دیس میں / علوم
الحدیث: ایک
تعارف / کتاب
الرسالہ:
امام شافعی کی
اصول فقہ پر
پہلی کتاب کا
اردو ترجمہ و
تلخیص
/ اسلام
اور دور حاضر
کی تبدیلیاں / ایڈورٹائزنگ
کا اخلاقی
پہلو سے
جائزہ / الحاد
جدید کے مغربی
اور مسلم
معاشروں پر
اثرات / اسلام
اور نسلی و
قومی امتیاز / اپنی
شخصیت اور
کردار کی تعمیر
کیسے کی
جائے؟
/ مایوسی
کا علاج کیوں
کر ممکن ہے؟ / دور جدید
میں دعوت دین
کا طریق کار / اسلام
کا خطرہ: محض ایک
وہم یا حقیقت / Quranic Concept of Human Life Cycle
/ Empirical
Evidence of God’s Accountability
|
||